{"id":8154,"date":"2022-05-12T11:25:21","date_gmt":"2022-05-12T08:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/?p=8154"},"modified":"2026-05-15T10:18:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T07:18:44","slug":"tt-norms-pro-a-8-year-history-of-the-font-family","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/blog\/tt-norms-pro-a-8-year-history-of-the-font-family\/","title":{"rendered":"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 8-year history of the font family"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/01-2.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8158\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro is&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the most sought-after typefaces in&nbsp;the TypeType collection. More than three reissues in&nbsp;8&nbsp;years, first lines in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.myfonts.com\/bestsellers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">MyFonts ratings<\/a>, dozens of&nbsp;customizations and reviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro<\/a>, released in&nbsp;2022, has 1668 characters in&nbsp;its font composition, 66&nbsp;faces and 1&nbsp;variable font changing along three axes. <a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">The TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono<\/a> subfamily contains 1181&nbsp;characters, 14&nbsp;faces and 1&nbsp;variable font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s hard to&nbsp;put into words what a&nbsp;valuable experience this font has been for everyone at&nbsp;the foundry, but we&nbsp;will try to&nbsp;tell its full story, with all its dead ends and mistakes, with the first victories and a&nbsp;massive redrawing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">It&nbsp;all started with an&nbsp;idea<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Back in&nbsp;2015, TypeType could only dream of&nbsp;creating the most popular typeface in&nbsp;the world. However, it&nbsp;was then that we&nbsp;got the idea to&nbsp;create a&nbsp;new typeface, fundamentally different from everything that had been done before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&nbsp;would have been nice to&nbsp;say that we&nbsp;already knew then that we&nbsp;were creating a&nbsp;legend, but everything was much more prosaic. One of&nbsp;the studio\u2019s type designers realized that when choosing a&nbsp;typeface for a&nbsp;new project, problems constantly arose: they liked the typeface visually, but did not like the character composition or&nbsp;the Cyrillic version. In&nbsp;addition, at&nbsp;that time the choice of&nbsp;geometric sans serifs was modest, although such fonts were gaining popularity in&nbsp;the world and becoming a&nbsp;trend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This was the prerequisite for creating their own product with a&nbsp;carefully crafted Cyrillic alphabet, an&nbsp;extensive character composition, and a&nbsp;universal character. We&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;get a&nbsp;font that would suit different projects, look stylish and modern\u2014a geometric sans serif with classic character proportions, neutral, but indispensable for designers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is&nbsp;how the first sketches appeared.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>TT&nbsp;Norms<\/strong><sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>\u2014first version<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2015\u20132017. From sketches to&nbsp;the top of&nbsp;MyFonts ranking<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;2015, the studio had a&nbsp;completely different approach to&nbsp;type design, but quite many ambitions and plans. We&nbsp;put all our efforts into creating a&nbsp;geometric sans serif with a&nbsp;universal character, because we&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;expand the scope of&nbsp;its application as&nbsp;much as&nbsp;possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"381\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8159\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-420x111.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-1024x271.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-768x203.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-1200x318.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-600x159.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/02-80x21.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The idea was taken into work right away, and from the first sketches, the active development of&nbsp;the font, for which at&nbsp;that time we&nbsp;did not have a&nbsp;name, began. The file with developments was called \u00abUntitled font\u00bb. At&nbsp;the end of&nbsp;2015\u2014beginning of&nbsp;2016, several letters were drawn in&nbsp;Adobe Illustrator, and on&nbsp;March&nbsp;7, 2016, the first face appeared. Each glyph was drawn in&nbsp;a&nbsp;graphics editor, and the plan was to&nbsp;create 7&nbsp;upright faces: Thin, Light, Regular, DemiBold, Bold, Black, Extra Black.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"679\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8160\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-420x198.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-1024x483.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-768x362.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-1200x566.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-600x283.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/03-80x38.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Simultaneously with the first developments, we&nbsp;began to&nbsp;think about the name of&nbsp;the future font. There were three versions proposed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The first was called Norms. It&nbsp;is&nbsp;formed from the word \u00abnorm\u00bb, alluding to&nbsp;example, sample, or&nbsp;standard.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The second name was Brevs. Translated from Norwegian this word means letters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The third contender was Completes, derived from the English \u00abcomplete\u00bb, that&nbsp;is, perfect or&nbsp;finished.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>It&nbsp;is&nbsp;not difficult to&nbsp;guess that the very first option was the winner. The name TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> still seems to&nbsp;be&nbsp;the most fitting option for&nbsp;us, as&nbsp;concise and memorable as&nbsp;the font itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The work continued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On&nbsp;March&nbsp;13, 2016, the font was fully assembled. The correct approches were set, kerning was done, features for working with alternative characters were specified. We&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;bring the typeface to&nbsp;its final state as&nbsp;quickly as&nbsp;possible in&nbsp;order to&nbsp;pay more attention to&nbsp;honing and refining it&nbsp;while seeing the finished result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first edits are still in&nbsp;the team\u2019s archive folder. We&nbsp;share some of&nbsp;them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In&nbsp;different sizes, the edges of&nbsp;the number 8&nbsp;and the Latin lowercase letter f&nbsp;were displayed wrinkled or&nbsp;cut off.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"680\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/04.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8161\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The shapes of&nbsp;the rounded elements of&nbsp;the Latin lowercase letters&nbsp;r, f&nbsp;have changed compared to&nbsp;the original versions. The r&nbsp;got a&nbsp;more rounded shape, while the f&nbsp;got a&nbsp;sharper tip.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"680\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/05.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8162\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In&nbsp;some pairs, the letters flew apart, which was a&nbsp;kerning mistake. This problem could be&nbsp;encountered when working with a&nbsp;certain size and scale.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The gap in&nbsp;the pair of&nbsp;lowercase and uppercase letters was significantly larger than the indentation within the word, which was also a&nbsp;kerning flaw.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/06.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8163\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>There were indeed some flaws in&nbsp;the first iterations, but it&nbsp;didn\u2019t matter at&nbsp;all, because even then the first impression of&nbsp;the font exceeded all the team\u2019s expectations. TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> looked really harmonious: both the shape of&nbsp;the letters and the diacritics were very attractive. The enthusiasm to&nbsp;continue the work was very high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"799\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8164\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-420x233.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-1024x568.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-768x426.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-1200x666.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-600x333.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-80x44.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;the end of&nbsp;March, the plans were to&nbsp;draw 7&nbsp;upright faces, namely Thin, Light, Regular, Medium, DemiBold, Bold and ExtraBlack. It&nbsp;seemed to&nbsp;us that this particular set would cover all the needs of&nbsp;designers. By&nbsp;the way, in&nbsp;the final version, we&nbsp;still added 2&nbsp;more faces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At&nbsp;that time, we&nbsp;worked in&nbsp;the FontLab 5&nbsp;program, and all the styles were drawn by&nbsp;hand. After making changes, the project was brought into the CRM system. It\u2019s worth noting that we&nbsp;didn\u2019t work on&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> on&nbsp;a&nbsp;daily basis, because other projects were going on&nbsp;in&nbsp;parallel, so&nbsp;sometimes the font was lying around and waiting for its time to&nbsp;come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> By&nbsp;the time the idea was formed, the font was taken into development and partially rendered, we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;take a&nbsp;break and wait until the team\u2019s resources were freed up&nbsp;to&nbsp;continue working.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;November 2016, we&nbsp;took the finished developments as&nbsp;a&nbsp;basis as&nbsp;a&nbsp;medium font and added Heavy and Thin, that&nbsp;is, the thickest and thinnest fonts. In&nbsp;the process, we&nbsp;found some small flaws so&nbsp;we&nbsp;made changes in&nbsp;parallel. For example, in&nbsp;lowercase Latin letters&nbsp;a, y.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"405\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8165\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-420x118.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-1024x288.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-768x216.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-1200x338.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-600x169.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/07-01-80x23.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;January 2017, seven upright faces were ready, and ExtraLight was added to&nbsp;the originally planned ones. In&nbsp;the first version of&nbsp;the font, DemiBold was dropped, as&nbsp;the difference in&nbsp;vertical stroke weights between it&nbsp;and Medium was negligible. But the boldest\u2014Heavy\u2014has been added to&nbsp;the palette of&nbsp;faces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8166\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/08-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>During additional testing, further needed edits were identified, some of&nbsp;them are shown below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The inter-letter spacing of&nbsp;some ligatures looked heterogeneous, so&nbsp;the task was to&nbsp;make everything look harmonically.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"440\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/09.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8167\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Some characters changed shape in&nbsp;different styles, for example, in&nbsp;the thinner Regular, the number 1&nbsp;looked different than in&nbsp;Medium.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"375\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/10.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8168\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Some forms of&nbsp;glyphs have changed compared to&nbsp;the original, for example, in&nbsp;Cyrillic&nbsp;\u043b, the smoothness of&nbsp;the turn has decreased.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"375\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/11.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8169\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;constantly examined the font for flaws and made changes, trying to&nbsp;consider all the details finalizing the font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;the same period, real italics appeared, that&nbsp;is, with a&nbsp;change in&nbsp;the shape of&nbsp;characters. It&nbsp;was an&nbsp;experiment that we&nbsp;later abandoned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On&nbsp;May&nbsp;30, 2017, the first version of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> was completed. We&nbsp;have released the project on&nbsp;the platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There were 18&nbsp;faces in&nbsp;the 2017 version of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>: 9&nbsp;upright (Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, Bold, ExtraBold, Black, Heavy) and 9&nbsp;italics duplicating them. The character composition of&nbsp;the first version of&nbsp;the font was 530 characters in&nbsp;each style. Later, the number of&nbsp;glyphs will increase by&nbsp;more than three times!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Together with the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> font family, a&nbsp;specimen came out with all the necessary information and graphic materials on&nbsp;the font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/12-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8170\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Our efforts were not in&nbsp;vain: almost immediately after the launch of&nbsp;sales, the released font became a&nbsp;bestseller on&nbsp;MyFonts. Of&nbsp;course, this served as&nbsp;a&nbsp;powerful motivation to&nbsp;continue working on&nbsp;the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> update, improving it&nbsp;from a&nbsp;visual and technical points of&nbsp;view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>\u2014continuation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2017\u20132018. From version 1.2 to&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>After the release of&nbsp;the first version and the success on&nbsp;the platforms, we&nbsp;started thinking about expanding the font family. We&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;give designers the most versatile tool in&nbsp;their arsenal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Version&nbsp;1.2 was implemented almost immediately after the release of&nbsp;the first. We&nbsp;have increased the character composition to&nbsp;610 glyphs in&nbsp;each style by&nbsp;adding extended Latin characters, old-style and tabular figures, arrows, and figures in&nbsp;circles with and without fill. For both versions, automatic hinting was done using ttfautohint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/13-2.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8389\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;2017, we&nbsp;also met the team of&nbsp;the oldest font studio from the capital. More experienced colleagues at&nbsp;that time made an&nbsp;audit of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> and helped&nbsp;us to&nbsp;pay attention to&nbsp;some technical shortcomings, which we&nbsp;immediately began to&nbsp;correct. It&nbsp;was then that the realization came that without establishing the technical department and the development of&nbsp;software, it&nbsp;would be&nbsp;difficult to&nbsp;develop the font, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;began preparing software products that would help control the quality of&nbsp;the fonts produced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department was formed and expanded. In&nbsp;2018, the team mastered manual hinting and created their own set of&nbsp;utilities for quality control of&nbsp;font families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s easy to&nbsp;imagine that the whole of&nbsp;2018 was devoted to&nbsp;changes in&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>. We&nbsp;actually redrew the font during this period, starting with a&nbsp;global study to&nbsp;understand what glyphs can be&nbsp;added to&nbsp;the font. The team also recalculated the parameters \u200b\u200bof stems for better compatibility between the faces, changed the interpolation in&nbsp;the fonts and, since each style and each glyph was changed manually, redrew almost the entire font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Real italics were replaced by&nbsp;italics completely repeating the original drawing of&nbsp;upright character obliquely. The character composition expanded to&nbsp;1392&nbsp;characters: Greek and Vietnamese languages \u200b\u200bappeared, the palette of&nbsp;Latin and Cyrillic languages \u200b\u200bexpanded. We&nbsp;have added new currency signs, including their variations: numerators, denominators, tabulators and old style forms. We&nbsp;supplemented the font with service characters, thought over OpenType features, which, as&nbsp;we&nbsp;understood, were used by&nbsp;all professionals in&nbsp;type design. Hinting was done manually, which increased the value of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> when working in&nbsp;a&nbsp;web environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8172\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/14-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Of&nbsp;course, with these changes, we&nbsp;released not just an&nbsp;update, but a&nbsp;new version of&nbsp;the font, which received the prefix \u00abpro\u00bb and changed its name to&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro. At&nbsp;that time, it&nbsp;was the largest and most voluminous project of&nbsp;all that we&nbsp;ever did. The font went on&nbsp;sale in&nbsp;January 2019 and again captivated users, becoming popular all over the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;began to&nbsp;receive feedback from users, including feedback on&nbsp;shortcomings or&nbsp;bugs noticed during use. For&nbsp;us, messages from a&nbsp;real audience are always a&nbsp;valuable contribution to&nbsp;the development of&nbsp;a&nbsp;font, because it&nbsp;is&nbsp;an&nbsp;opportunity to&nbsp;quickly fix all the flaws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;constantly rechecked the character composition until we&nbsp;realized that the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro version needed major changes. Thus began work on&nbsp;version 2.140.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, based on&nbsp;feedback from users, we&nbsp;have added 4&nbsp;new weights that were mentioned in&nbsp;requests most often: Normal, Normal Italic, DemiBold, DemiBold Italic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"729\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-420x213.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-1024x518.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-768x389.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-1200x608.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-600x304.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/15-80x41.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The character composition has gone through yet another expansion, this time reaching 1,590&nbsp;glyphs, an&nbsp;incredible number for TypeType. At&nbsp;that time, TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro in&nbsp;version 2.140 was the most extensive in&nbsp;terms of&nbsp;character composition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;thoroughly studied the market, conducted research and rethought the features for the font family. This time we&nbsp;have included localizations for Serbian, Chuvash, Bashkir, Bulgarian, Moldavian (Romanian), Catalan and Dutch. In&nbsp;the language composition of&nbsp;the updated TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro, even the languages \u200b\u200bof the small peoples of&nbsp;Russia were present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro&nbsp;2.140&nbsp;we made the first variable font at&nbsp;TypeType. It&nbsp;was a&nbsp;compromise version for those who insistently asked for a&nbsp;similar font, because it&nbsp;resulted in&nbsp;2&nbsp;variable fonts: one for uprights, and the other for oblique faces. Separate variable fonts for straight and italics appeared due to&nbsp;technical difficulties: the number of&nbsp;dots between styles did not match, which made it&nbsp;difficult to&nbsp;correctly switch variations. Each weight, as&nbsp;we&nbsp;already mentioned, was a&nbsp;hand-drawn master, so&nbsp;reaching such a&nbsp;compromise was a&nbsp;victory, because the variable fonts worked really well at&nbsp;the end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department checked the font for bugs and shortcomings, which were fixed in&nbsp;parallel. Edits were made constantly, because we&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;make this font the best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department also collected feedback from users, making improvements to&nbsp;the operation of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro. For example, in&nbsp;the course of&nbsp;work, we&nbsp;found that some of&nbsp;the legs of&nbsp;the letters were unstable, that&nbsp;is, they moved up&nbsp;and down. In&nbsp;type design, there are 2&nbsp;types of&nbsp;curves: OpenType and TrueType, and the technical department had to&nbsp;convert some parts of&nbsp;the curves to&nbsp;TrueType in&nbsp;order for the variable font to&nbsp;be&nbsp;correctly generated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&nbsp;is&nbsp;worth noting that this version is&nbsp;the most popular and in&nbsp;demand. It&nbsp;was released in&nbsp;2020, and if&nbsp;you have used or&nbsp;at&nbsp;least heard of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro, then with a&nbsp;high probability it&nbsp;was version 2.140. At&nbsp;the time of&nbsp;release, it&nbsp;was the most time-consuming and complete font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;haven\u2019t stopped improving TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro even after the updates. For example, one of&nbsp;the clients noticed that in&nbsp;version 2.140 the Polish diacritics were not drawn correctly, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;completely redrew it&nbsp;in&nbsp;all styles. A&nbsp;rather time-consuming process, but inevitable when you want to&nbsp;your font to&nbsp;be&nbsp;the best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>\u2014dead end<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2018\u20132020. Simplified TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Std, Condensed and Expanded<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The story that we&nbsp;will tell in&nbsp;this chapter chronologically intersects with the previous one. By&nbsp;2018, the entire TypeType team fell in&nbsp;love with TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;were constantly thinking about new ways to&nbsp;improve the font. In&nbsp;addition to&nbsp;working on&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro, there was an&nbsp;alternate history of&nbsp;the font\u2019s development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;2018, the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> typeface has already become a&nbsp;complex typeface with a&nbsp;huge character composition, an&nbsp;abundance of&nbsp;languages and styles. As&nbsp;we&nbsp;mentioned, this is&nbsp;the only font in&nbsp;the TypeType collection that supports extremely rare languages, which began to&nbsp;affect the price of&nbsp;the font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;came up&nbsp;with the idea to&nbsp;make a&nbsp;simplified version of&nbsp;the classic TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>, reducing the character composition to&nbsp;a&nbsp;basic alphabet, numbers and punctuation. This product could become more accessible to&nbsp;a&nbsp;wide range of&nbsp;consumers, including those who do&nbsp;not use a&nbsp;large number of&nbsp;features and characters in&nbsp;their work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lighter versions were to&nbsp;be&nbsp;called TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Std and included the classic TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Std, the narrower <a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed<\/a> and the wider <a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Expanded<\/a>. In&nbsp;the simplified version, the character composition was only 378 glyphs for each style.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"632\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8370\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-1024x449.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-768x337.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-1200x527.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-420x184.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-600x263.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/16-80x35.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>For those of&nbsp;you who love spoilers, we&nbsp;only released TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed as&nbsp;a&nbsp;result, although almost everything was drawn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;started the work on&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed, which began with extensive research. The art director of&nbsp;the studio studied all the sans serifs of&nbsp;large studios, in&nbsp;the family of&nbsp;which, in&nbsp;addition to&nbsp;the classic ones, there were narrow versions. In&nbsp;the course of&nbsp;the research, we&nbsp;were able to&nbsp;understand what values are considered optimal for narrowing, so&nbsp;that at&nbsp;the same time visual harmony and character of&nbsp;the font family would be&nbsp;preserved, and with which values the font pattern would be&nbsp;severely deformed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1391\" height=\"910\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8371\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17.jpg 1391w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-420x275.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-1024x670.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-768x502.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-1200x785.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-600x393.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/17-80x52.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1391px) 100vw, 1391px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The study also looked at&nbsp;the number of&nbsp;weights for narrow versions to&nbsp;understand at&nbsp;what maximum weight the font would still look aesthetically pleasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, as&nbsp;a&nbsp;result, we&nbsp;relied more on&nbsp;our own opinion and observation than on&nbsp;examples of&nbsp;other typefaces. As&nbsp;a&nbsp;result, the team was able to&nbsp;determine the values for the thickness, height and narrowness of&nbsp;the signs. We&nbsp;decided to&nbsp;make uppercase characters narrower by&nbsp;78-80% and lowercase characters by&nbsp;75%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;began to&nbsp;look for the optimal value using the example of&nbsp;the medium, the thinnest and the boldest styles, because the same changes will affect the font drawing in&nbsp;different ways. It&nbsp;was also decided to&nbsp;abandon the boldest typeface because it&nbsp;was no&nbsp;longer possible to&nbsp;achieve visual harmony when narrowing the letters in&nbsp;this thickness. By&nbsp;the way, other type foundries often make a&nbsp;similar decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All the results of&nbsp;the research and analysis were agreed, however, TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed did not go&nbsp;into work immediately due to&nbsp;the load and the presence of&nbsp;higher priority tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Glyph rendering started with three weights, namely Thin, Regular, and Black. Later, designers joined in&nbsp;to&nbsp;work on&nbsp;the rest of&nbsp;the styles, including italics. Due to&nbsp;the manual rendering of&nbsp;glyphs in&nbsp;all styles, the work was energy-intensive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;were still working in&nbsp;FontLab&nbsp;5, where it&nbsp;was not possible to&nbsp;create reference masters and generate intermediate styles based on&nbsp;them. Later we&nbsp;switched to&nbsp;Glyphs and this transition influenced the development of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>, but we&nbsp;will talk about this a&nbsp;bit later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Std versions, plans changed as&nbsp;we&nbsp;worked: we&nbsp;had thoughts of&nbsp;releasing it&nbsp;as&nbsp;a&nbsp;standalone product or&nbsp;finishing it&nbsp;in&nbsp;the future for other purposes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The main work on&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed took place in&nbsp;2019, and the font was released in&nbsp;April 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8372\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/18-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department checked and tested the finished font files for errors, checked the level of&nbsp;ascenders and descenders, the contours of&nbsp;tabular figures, looked at&nbsp;how dots are located in&nbsp;uppercase and lowercase characters, and manually equalized approches. It&nbsp;also did kerning and its transfer into the main font file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;cut down the font composition to&nbsp;the standard encoding. Before doing&nbsp;so, the team did some research to&nbsp;figure out which set to&nbsp;keep. It&nbsp;was important that the user still be&nbsp;able to&nbsp;use the main European languages. Finally, manual hinting was done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Next in&nbsp;line was the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Expanded. The wide version of&nbsp;the font was organized in&nbsp;the same way as&nbsp;the narrow version. In&nbsp;the beginning, a&nbsp;study was conducted to&nbsp;determine the necessary parameters for expanding the font. Accordingly, families containing the wide version were selected for analysis. After several iterations, we&nbsp;came to&nbsp;the optimal values: 110% and 120%, depending on&nbsp;the style. In&nbsp;this version, they decided not to&nbsp;discard the boldest style, because it&nbsp;looked harmonious.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1391\" height=\"910\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8373\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19.jpg 1391w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-420x275.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-1024x670.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-768x502.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-1200x785.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-600x393.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/19-80x52.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1391px) 100vw, 1391px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The final values turned out to&nbsp;be&nbsp;around 125%, because it&nbsp;was in&nbsp;this width that the glyphs looked quite attractive. When developing TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Expanded, we&nbsp;already had in&nbsp;mind that in&nbsp;the future we&nbsp;would make a&nbsp;real variable version of&nbsp;the font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/20-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;the way, it&nbsp;was during this period that our studio began the transition from FontLab to&nbsp;Glyphs, but the extended version of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> was created using the usual technology. At&nbsp;some point, it&nbsp;became clear that TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Expanded would not be&nbsp;released for sale, because plans had changed towards a&nbsp;new version 3.0 with an&nbsp;expanded character composition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, we&nbsp;focused on&nbsp;working with Expanded for its further use in&nbsp;a&nbsp;variable font, but porting difficulties and a&nbsp;reduced character composition led to&nbsp;the fact that later the wide version for TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> was redrawn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It&nbsp;turned out that the development line of&nbsp;the Expanded version came to&nbsp;a&nbsp;standstill, and with it&nbsp;the entire Std line. Priorities have shifted, TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Condensed has not lived up&nbsp;to&nbsp;expectations in&nbsp;terms of&nbsp;demand, and our team has already begun working on&nbsp;a&nbsp;completely new version of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/21-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Work on&nbsp;Expanded was put on&nbsp;halt, and the resources of&nbsp;designers were transferred to&nbsp;priority tasks. However, this stage is&nbsp;an&nbsp;experience that is&nbsp;rarely overwhelmingly positive. There was no&nbsp;need to&nbsp;get upset, because ahead of&nbsp;us was the most voluminous task that we&nbsp;had ever set in&nbsp;working with TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>TT&nbsp;Norms<\/strong><sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro\u2014return of&nbsp;the legend<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2021\u20132022. Full scale variable font, uniwidth subfamily and completely dedrawn character composition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/22-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8376\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> is&nbsp;in&nbsp;many ways a&nbsp;unique font for the studio. Although we&nbsp;liked it&nbsp;from the very beginning, we&nbsp;always continued to&nbsp;look for new opportunities to&nbsp;improve and change&nbsp;it. Seven years have passed since the launch of&nbsp;the first version, and during this time the TypeType studio has changed as&nbsp;much as&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>. Our staff and competencies of&nbsp;employees grew, and we&nbsp;divided into technical and graphic departments, improving each of&nbsp;them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, when we&nbsp;first planned version 3.0, everyone understood how difficult, grandiose and labor-intensive it&nbsp;would&nbsp;be. As&nbsp;discussed in&nbsp;the previous chapter, testing a&nbsp;product with a&nbsp;reduced character composition has reached a&nbsp;dead end. Instead, we&nbsp;decided to&nbsp;expand TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro to&nbsp;the maximum, add a&nbsp;narrow and wide version to&nbsp;the font file, and create italics for all styles, and then collect all this in&nbsp;a&nbsp;font that is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/blog\/variable-fonts-whats-new-in-them-for-designers\/\">variable<\/a> along all axes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"500\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/23.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8387\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;other words, we&nbsp;abandoned the abridged versions in&nbsp;favor of&nbsp;a&nbsp;very rich one, containing all the previous developments. We&nbsp;had to&nbsp;take the rendered characters as&nbsp;a&nbsp;basis and add the missing ones, that&nbsp;is, to&nbsp;make one very large family of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro in&nbsp;version 3.0. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The new character composition was 1668 characters for each style. Since we&nbsp;started working in&nbsp;the new software, we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;manually draw not all styles, but only reference masters. However, there were still a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;them\u201432&nbsp;masters. Working in&nbsp;one font file was a&nbsp;must to&nbsp;create the perfect variable face for the user.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, let\u2019s explain what we&nbsp;mean when we&nbsp;talk about a&nbsp;face \u00abvariable on&nbsp;all axes.\u00bb This means that the font will shrink and expand at&nbsp;the same time, change the slope or&nbsp;thickness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First of&nbsp;all, we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;transfer TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> to&nbsp;the new font software, that&nbsp;is, to&nbsp;Glyphs. Given the huge character composition, this was already a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;work. When transferring files, the technical department had to&nbsp;reconfigure and check features, outlines, Font Info settings, and kerning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Absolutely everything was transferred, including the narrow and wide Std versions, and all the while it&nbsp;was necessary to&nbsp;make sure that all styles were interpolated with each other. All dots in&nbsp;each letter of&nbsp;one style had to&nbsp;match those in&nbsp;a&nbsp;similar letter in&nbsp;another style in&nbsp;terms of&nbsp;the number, direction of&nbsp;the contours, and the logic of&nbsp;construction. However, fonts were drawn in&nbsp;different years, moreover, by&nbsp;many designers, so&nbsp;one letter could be&nbsp;interpolated differently even within the same font.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"762\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8377\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-420x222.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-1024x542.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-768x406.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-1200x635.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-600x318.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/24-80x42.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Probably, from the outside, the difference might be&nbsp;not as&nbsp;noticeable, but for&nbsp;us it&nbsp;was a&nbsp;fundamental moment. Interpolation should be&nbsp;smooth, signs should not jump in&nbsp;height or&nbsp;width, cuts should have the same construction logic. To&nbsp;correct each such issue, colossal work was required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Work on&nbsp;version 3.0 took about 4,000 man-hours, a&nbsp;time in&nbsp;which we&nbsp;could potentially redraw the font from scratch. Indeed, over the years of&nbsp;development, so&nbsp;many people with their own views and methods have worked on&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> that it&nbsp;is&nbsp;rather difficult to&nbsp;combine this into one concept. With that, even the same person in&nbsp;8&nbsp;years changes a&nbsp;lot as&nbsp;a&nbsp;specialist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another problem with merging files was that the Condensed version had one less face. This was no&nbsp;problem when it&nbsp;came out as&nbsp;a&nbsp;standalone product, but now there was a&nbsp;need to&nbsp;have all thicknesses in&nbsp;all widths. Accordingly, now the boldest ExtraBlack, which we&nbsp;had previously abandoned for visual reasons, had to&nbsp;be&nbsp;redrawn and made attractive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Moreover, there were more basic masters in&nbsp;version 3.0 than we&nbsp;expected. There are usually 4&nbsp;masters in&nbsp;a&nbsp;standard sans serif: an&nbsp;intermediate one (Regular or&nbsp;Medium), two extreme ones (the thinnest and the boldest) and a&nbsp;transition between the regular and the boldest (DemiBold or&nbsp;Bold). The latter is&nbsp;necessary to&nbsp;remove the optical compensation that arises because of&nbsp;the bold style.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro version 3.0, 4&nbsp;masters were also originally planned, but in&nbsp;the process we&nbsp;realized that there was an&nbsp;excess of&nbsp;contrast in&nbsp;the regular font, which was not present in&nbsp;version 2.140&nbsp;or previous ones. It&nbsp;looked aesthetically pleasing but didn\u2019t fit the character of&nbsp;the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>. The font should not change fundamentally, for instance in&nbsp;such issues as&nbsp;the presence or&nbsp;absence of&nbsp;contrast, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;solve this problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;decided to&nbsp;add a&nbsp;5th master to&nbsp;correct the situation. This in&nbsp;itself did not take much time, however, after the introduction of&nbsp;an&nbsp;additional style, we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;edit each corrected or&nbsp;new glyph 5&nbsp;times, and then do&nbsp;the same with italics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"491\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/25.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8378\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The volume of&nbsp;work was large, so&nbsp;it&nbsp;was carried out by&nbsp;several specialists at&nbsp;once. From the type design perspective, working on&nbsp;one file at&nbsp;a&nbsp;time is&nbsp;a&nbsp;difficult task in&nbsp;organization of&nbsp;the workflow process, but it&nbsp;went well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;version 3.0, we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;re-check the contours, interpolation, and set all components and anchors according to&nbsp;the new system. In&nbsp;addition to&nbsp;the wide face in&nbsp;the narrow version of&nbsp;the font, more than 1000 characters had to&nbsp;be&nbsp;added\u2014not only in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">Condensed<\/a>, but also in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">Expanded<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By&nbsp;the way, due to&nbsp;the fact that the boldest style in&nbsp;Condensed had to&nbsp;be&nbsp;redrawn, this version has 6&nbsp;reference masters for upright faces, since ExtraBlack had to&nbsp;be&nbsp;thought through very carefully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some of&nbsp;the edits and even global redraws were caused by&nbsp;the personal wishes of&nbsp;the team. When a&nbsp;specialist looks at&nbsp;their old typeface, there is&nbsp;certainly a&nbsp;desire to&nbsp;correct or&nbsp;change something. This is&nbsp;because the specialists increase their quality levels over time\u2014and this within an&nbsp;entire studio of&nbsp;specialists has grown into a&nbsp;painstaking, detailed and thorough reworking of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro. To&nbsp;be&nbsp;honest, as&nbsp;a&nbsp;result, we&nbsp;have corrected or&nbsp;somehow changed almost every glyph, while reverently preserving the character of&nbsp;the original TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"762\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8379\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-420x222.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-1024x542.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-768x406.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-1200x635.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-600x318.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/26-80x42.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Some things have been redrawn from scratch, such as&nbsp;the Vietnamese diacritics. The Vietnamese language is&nbsp;rarely used in&nbsp;our fonts, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;were not perfect experts in&nbsp;drawing the Vietnamese alphabet. We&nbsp;had to&nbsp;do&nbsp;a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;research about the language and its origins, about what it&nbsp;should look like. As&nbsp;a&nbsp;result, we&nbsp;now have manuals on&nbsp;this topic and an&nbsp;understanding of&nbsp;how to&nbsp;correct the Vietnamese language in&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro. It&nbsp;turned out that all glyphs are based on&nbsp;the signs of&nbsp;the Latin or&nbsp;extended Latin composition that we&nbsp;have already drawn, and the main feature of&nbsp;the Vietnamese language is&nbsp;complex diacritics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another example is&nbsp;Greek. When we&nbsp;carefully looked at&nbsp;it&nbsp;in&nbsp;version 2.140, we&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;redraw&nbsp;it. We&nbsp;conducted a&nbsp;study and outlined the changes to&nbsp;be&nbsp;implemented: correct the thickness and polish the forms. Not as&nbsp;globally as&nbsp;with Vietnamese, but still it&nbsp;was necessary to&nbsp;change each character 16&nbsp;times in&nbsp;the basic upright faces, and then the same number in&nbsp;italics. In&nbsp;general, the work was voluminous. By&nbsp;the way, TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro font is&nbsp;the only one in&nbsp;our collection that has the Greek language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"639\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-420x186.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-1024x454.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-768x341.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-1200x533.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-600x266.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/27-80x36.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>As&nbsp;for the Italics, we&nbsp;planned to&nbsp;transfer the existing styles to&nbsp;the new font file without changing almost anything, since their shape suited&nbsp;us completely. However, due to&nbsp;the fact that most of&nbsp;the glyphs were changed, italics had to&nbsp;be&nbsp;redrawn too. Given the scale of&nbsp;the box office, it&nbsp;required quite an&nbsp;effort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"680\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8381\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-420x198.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-1024x484.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-768x363.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-1200x567.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-600x283.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/28-80x38.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department, when working with version 3.0, first reviewed the 16&nbsp;basic upright masters, setting up&nbsp;the Font Info, glyph sorting, and making initial edits. In&nbsp;parallel, kerning was done, which was partially taken from 2.140. After transferring the kerning, we&nbsp;finished the edits. After mastering the upright styles, it&nbsp;was the time to&nbsp;work on&nbsp;italics, which had 16&nbsp;basic masters. There were 32&nbsp;masters in&nbsp;total.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Edits were made throughout all the work, after which the specialists split the font file into 3&nbsp;parts and divided the work in&nbsp;order to&nbsp;check the files in&nbsp;parallel. One source included Condensed along with italics, the second included Expanded with italics, and the third included the normal form of&nbsp;the font along with italics. The contours were checked, and it&nbsp;was also important to&nbsp;make sure that the heights of&nbsp;glyphs did not jump. We&nbsp;had to&nbsp;run the files through the scripts and TypeType plugins used to&nbsp;check the final fonts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Next, the features were checked, the font was adjusted to&nbsp;generate static styles and a&nbsp;variable font. It&nbsp;was difficult to&nbsp;upload a&nbsp;file with such a&nbsp;huge number of&nbsp;masters to&nbsp;MyFonts, so&nbsp;we&nbsp;had to&nbsp;experimentally remove the masters and make sure that the resulting boldness corresponded to&nbsp;static styles. There were 24&nbsp;masters left: Black, Light and Extra Bold were removed from Condensed along with their italics, and from the remaining two (Expanded and Normal)\u2014only Light and Extra Bold along with their italics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The contour check was completed in&nbsp;the summer, after which 3&nbsp;files were merged into 1. We&nbsp;prepared Character Sets, later finalized the kerning, and added final edits for vertical metrics and Font info. Small changes were made up&nbsp;until the last moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"450\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/29.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8382\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>With version 3.0&nbsp;complete, we&nbsp;moved on&nbsp;to&nbsp;the final part, a&nbsp;monospace font from the TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> family. Many expected to&nbsp;see&nbsp;it, and we&nbsp;ourselves have long wanted to&nbsp;add a&nbsp;new subfamily to&nbsp;the most popular font from the TypeType collection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono is&nbsp;a&nbsp;standalone monospace font based on&nbsp;the drawing of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>. The character composition is&nbsp;smaller than in&nbsp;the classic version, and all the em&nbsp;squares are 600&nbsp;points. All characters are inscribed in&nbsp;this area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8383\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-420x210.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-1200x600.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/30-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The studio has a&nbsp;special plug-in in&nbsp;its arsenal that automatically makes a&nbsp;blank based on&nbsp;the given glyph deformation values. At&nbsp;some stages, this plugin was used, and otherwise we&nbsp;would target the visual character and drawing of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> glyphs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&nbsp;thought of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono primarily as&nbsp;a&nbsp;practical coding font, but we&nbsp;didn\u2019t limit ourselves to&nbsp;that use case. After all, monospace fonts are now becoming a&nbsp;trend in&nbsp;branding, art exhibitions and other areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/31.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8384\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The set of&nbsp;features is&nbsp;almost identical to&nbsp;the composition of&nbsp;the classic TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>, but we&nbsp;have removed the tabular figures and currencies, because the entire font can be&nbsp;called tabular due to&nbsp;the squares of&nbsp;the same width.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;total we&nbsp;made 7&nbsp;upright styles and 7&nbsp;italics. The basic masters were Thin, Medium and Bold. There are no&nbsp;overly bold styles in&nbsp;this font. TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono complements version 3.0 and comes with&nbsp;it, although it&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;separate subfamily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono font was drawn in&nbsp;a&nbsp;month.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The technical department did a&nbsp;full audit checking glyphs and contours, Font info settings, variation, and monospacing. There were minor edits on&nbsp;the contours that were made in&nbsp;the process of&nbsp;work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"629\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32.jpg\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8385\" srcset=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32.jpg 1440w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-420x183.jpg 420w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-1024x447.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-768x335.jpg 768w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-1200x524.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-600x262.jpg 600w, https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/32-80x35.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Hinting was partly carried over from the base version of&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> because we&nbsp;have a&nbsp;tool to&nbsp;transpose hinting into other weights or&nbsp;fonts. The rest of&nbsp;the hinting was edited manually.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is&nbsp;the first experience of&nbsp;releasing a&nbsp;monospaced version of&nbsp;a&nbsp;popular font from the collection. <a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro<\/a> version 3.0 and <a href=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/fonts\/tt-norms-pro\/\">TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono<\/a> is&nbsp;a&nbsp;project that has taken a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;time, effort and skill. However, we&nbsp;believe we&nbsp;were able to&nbsp;release the best version of&nbsp;this font ever!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With every major rework, we&nbsp;feel like TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> couldn\u2019t get any better. However, months pass, and we&nbsp;again come up&nbsp;with something new, and fix and develop this typeface. It\u2019s nice to&nbsp;know that along with TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>, the TypeType studio itself has changed, becoming stronger, smarter and more experienced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-style-default\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1440\" height=\"250\" src=\"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/final.gif\" alt=\"TT Norms\u00ae Pro: a 7-year history of the font family\" class=\"wp-image-8386\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Involved in&nbsp;working on&nbsp;the font<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup>&nbsp;1.0 and 1.2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ivan Gladkikh\u2014project director, technical director <br>Pavel Emelyanov\u2014art director of\u00a0the project, designer<br>Oleksa Volochay\u2014designer<br>Nadyr Rakhimov\u2014designer<br>Dmitry Greshnev\u2014designer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Std<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yulia Gonina\u2014art director <br>Ivan Gladkikh\u2014technical director<br>Yuri Nakonechny\u2014head of\u00a0technical department<br>Nadezhda Polomoshnova\u2014designer<br>Marina Khodak\u2014senior designer<br>Anna Tikhonova\u2014senior designer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro&nbsp;3.0 \u0438&nbsp;TT&nbsp;Norms<sup class=\"reg\">\u00ae<\/sup> Pro Mono<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yulia Gonina\u2014art director <br>Ivan Gladkikh\u2014technical director<br>Yuri Nakonechny\u2014head of\u00a0technical department<br>Marina Khodak\u2014senior designer<br>Anna Tikhonova\u2014senior designer<br>Evgeny Tansturin\u2014designer<br>Antonina Zhulkova\u2014designer<br>Kirill Maslov\u2014designer<br>Nadyr Rakhimov\u2014designer<br>Mikhail Nekrasov\u2014designer<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TT\u00a0Norms Pro is\u00a0one of\u00a0the most sought-after typefaces in\u00a0the TypeType collection. More than three reissues in\u00a08\u00a0years, first lines in\u00a0MyFonts ratings, dozens of\u00a0customizations and reviews.<br \/>\nIt\u2019s hard to\u00a0put into words what a\u00a0valuable experience this font has been for everyone at\u00a0the foundry, but we\u00a0will try to\u00a0tell its full story, with all its dead ends and mistakes, with the first victories and a\u00a0massive redrawing process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8156,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[183,184],"class_list":["post-8154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-font-creation","tag-typetype-fonts"],"acf":{"show_sidebar":true},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8154"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46689,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8154\/revisions\/46689"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typetype.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}